Before the:

 

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER

 

 

 

BURSON-MARSTELLER, LLC

230 Park Avenue South

New York, New York 10003

 

(Complainant)

Case No: D2002-1012

 

 

 

 

-v-

 

 

Disputed Domain Name:

 

           BURSONMARSTELLER.COM

 

Dexter Smith

30 Rockefeller Plaza

New York, New York 10112

 

(Respondent)

 

 

 

<bursonmarsteller.com>

________________________________

 

 

 

RESPONSE

 

I.  Introduction

 

[1.]    On Sunday, November 17, 2002, the Respondent received a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative Proceeding from the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the Center) by e-mail informing the Respondent that an administrative proceeding had been commenced by the Complainant in accordance with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy), approved by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) on October 24, 1999, the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Rules), approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999, and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Supplemental Rules).  The Center set November 27, 2002 as the last day for the submission of a Response by the Respondent.

 

 

II.  RespondentÕs Contact Details

 

[2.]      The RespondentÕs contact details are:

 

Name:                   Dexter L. Smith

Address:               30 Rockefeller Plaza

                             New York, New York, 10112

Telephone:           (413) 657-6463

E-mail:                  dexter@rtmark.com

                             dexterlsmith@yahoo.com

 

[3.]    The RespondentÕs authorized representative in this administrative proceeding is:

 

Name:                   Paul Hardwin, Advisor

Address:               Yurt Media Center

                             893 West St.

                             Amherst, MA 01002

Telephone:           (413) 559-6600

E-mail:                  phardwin@yurt.org

 

[4.]    The RespondentÕs preferred method of communications directed to the Respondent in this administrative proceeding is:

 

                        Electronic-only material

                        Method:           e-mail

                        Address:          dexter@rtmark.com

                        Contact:          Dexter Smith

 

                        Material including hardcopy

                        Method:          Post/Courier

Address:          Yurt Media Center

                             893 West St.

                                                Amherst, MA 01002

                        Contact:          Paul Hardwin

 

 

III.       Response to Statements and Allegations Made in Complaint

 

[5.]    This Response contests the ÒSummary of partiesÓ provided by the Complainant and furthermore calls into question the extent to which the public may trust the Complainant to accurately and fully represent its business practices on its Web site. The Respondent requests that the panel take into account the following additions during the proceedings.

 

[6.]    Established in 1953, Burson-Marsteller, LLC (The ÒComplainantÓ), to the extent that it and its trademark, ÒBurson-MarstellerÓ (the ÒTrademarkÓ) are commonly known outside of the public relations and advertising industries, has a well-documented public reputation for its unethical business practices, including for purposes of these proceedings but not limited to, working for repressive political regimes, organizing consumer-front groups to create the appearance of public support for harmful consumer products and unsustainable environmental practices, minimizing public knowledge of critical consumer and labor issues, exercising corporate influence over media outlets, and spying on and harassing political activists as noted by the Center for Media & Democracy in the 1995 book, Toxic Sludge is Good for You (see Annexes 10, 12, 13, and 14).

 

[7.]    The Respondent, Dexter L. Smith, is a resident of the State of New York and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and owner of a cellular telephone purchased in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

 

[8.]    The Respondent hereby responds to the statements and allegations in the Complaint and respectfully requests the Administrative Panel to deny the remedies requested by the Complainant, calling specific attention to the bases upon which the Complainant formulates the argument before the panel, and highlighting the importance of this dispute in securing the right to freely distribute and properly associate with a trademark and the business practices of the trademark holder educational material which is in the public interest and relevant to the well being of citizens of the World Intellectual Property OrganizationÕs (the ÒWIPOÓ) member states.